humble, human, humus
the result of artificial limitations is rebellion unless one is distracted, diverted, or deluded.
i do not rebel, so which am i?
0the result of artificial limitations is rebellion unless one is distracted, diverted, or deluded.
i do not rebel, so which am i?
0mundane ramblings . hermitage . art . process . artist residency . teaching . WASH foundations . SHSU Art . art foundations . June 2013 . VSC . i-park . microforest . road trip . exhibition . family . ART 5364 . academic textabation . Quote . art review . artists writings . Lecture . research . Dopt (the dog) . garden . Judith Butler . darke gallery . research ramblings . poetry . poems which aren't really poems just thinkings . fall 2012 . Life Style . r2 . 2D Project 2 . 3D project 2 . artist writings . 2012 fall p1 . r3 . 3D . BOX 13 ArtSpace
artful limits
==
What’s the limitation?
To acknowledge a boundary or barrier can be an act of rebellion. Yet, the pen may be mighter than the sword, but it lacks the drama. Mel Gibson with a broad sword, out sells Noam Chomsky with a keyboard.
Not feeling James Dean-ish
===
If you don’t rebel or don’t rebel dramatically enough to satisfy your inner drama queen, does the reason really matter. In the light of submission, can one distinguish among those who submit out of ignorance, neglect, or carelessness. Does the victor even care to?
ok. so i have rebelled–perhaps just not to the satisfaction of my “inner drama queen.”
since i have gotten no satisfaction from this rebellion and it has not rectified the situation, it feels as though i have done nothing. i have been a good vulcan/borg and followed logical and legal means for the benefit of the collective, but when one is dealing with another’s craziness, logic may not result in sane results. shoot, when one is dealing even just with the self, logic may not produce satisfactory or predictable results. thus i feel diverted and distracted by delusion. i am just unsure as to whose delusion i am floundering within.
kk